Nelson #149817 v. Arizona State Prison Complex, Lewis et al
| Rufus Edward Nelson |
| Charles L Ryan and Arizona State Prison Complex, Lewis |
| 2:2019cv04874 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the court's order filed September 18, 2019, the complaint is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MSA) |
Filing 4
ORDER - Movant's #1 "Motion for the Defendant to Give the Names Needed in Order to File Complaint" is denied and this case is dismissed without prejudice. Movant may file a new case by filing a complaint and either paying the $400 filing and administrative fees or filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non- Habeas). The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/18/19. (MSA)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (DXD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT (Motion to Obtain Names Needed to File Compliant) filed by Rufus Edward Nelson (2 pages). (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
