Uber USA LLC v. Cooper et al
| Uber USA LLC |
| Tiffany Swanson-Cooper and Brian Cooper |
| 2:2019cv04955 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| David G Campbell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Receipt of certified #20 Order with copies of Remand Letter by Clerk's Office, Maricopa County Superior Court, on 10/2/19. (LAD) |
Filing 20
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Remand to State Court; denying #17 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff's request for attorneys fees is denied. The Clerk is directed to remand this case to state court. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 9/261/9. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Remand Letter) (LAD)
|
| Filing 19 SUPPLEMENT re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Uber USA LLC, Counter Defendant Uber USA LLC. (Schlabach, Cole) |
| Filing 18 MOTION/Request for an Evidentiary Hearing as Plaintiff is Knowingly Filing for an Entity that Does Not Exist by Brian Cooper, Tiffany Swanson-Cooper. (REK) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Stay Further Proceedings Pending Remand by Uber USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schlabach, Cole) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE re: Order in Superior Court Proceeding by Uber USA LLC . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Schlabach, Cole) |
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Uber USA LLC. (Schlabach, Cole) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Brian Cooper, Tiffany Swanson-Cooper. (LAD) (167 pages, entitled Defendants File Their Response to Uber's Remand to State Claim. Parent Uber Technologies Incorporated) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Brian Cooper. (LAD) (5 pages) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: The application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefore (Doc. #2 ) is granted. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 9/9/19. (EJA)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Brian Cooper, Tiffany Swanson-Cooper. (LAD) (77 pages, Defendants See Summary Judgment) |
| Filing 10 COUNTERCLAIM against Uber USA LLC filed by Brian Cooper, Tiffany Swanson-Cooper.(LAD) (17 pages) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber USA LLC. (Schlabach, Cole) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Uber USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-2, #3 Exhibit A-3, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Schlabach, Cole) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (HLA) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (HLA) |
| Filing 5 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G Campbell. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4955-PHX-DGC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (HLA) |
| Filing 4 Additional Attachments (Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) to Main Document re: #1 Notice of Removal by Defendants Brian Cooper, Tiffany Swanson-Cooper. (HLA) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Brian Cooper. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (HLA) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Brian Cooper, Tiffany Swanson-Cooper. (HLA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-010522 filed by Brian Cooper, Tiffany Swanson-Cooper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1 - 4 (State Court Records))(HLA) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED: SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Tiffany Swanson-Cooper: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint (entitled as application to declare Brian Cooper and Tiffany Swanson-Cooper Vexatious Litigants) upon Tiffany Swanson-Cooper on 07/18/2019. FILED IN STATE COURT ON 07/19/2019. DOCKETED IN USDC FOR CASE MANAGMENT PURPOSES.** (HLA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED: SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Brian Cooper: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint (entitled as application to declare Brian Cooper and Tiffany Swanson-Cooper Vexatious Litigants) upon Brian Cooper on 07/08/2019.FILED IN STATE COURT ON 07/19/2019. DOCKETED IN USDC FOR CASE MANAGMENT PURPOSES.** (HLA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
