Barrios v. Phoenix, City of et al
Plaintiff: Francisco Barrios
Defendant: Unknown Parties, David R Hopkins and Phoenix, City of
Case Number: 2:2019cv04982
Filed: August 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine (PS)
Referring Judge: Susan M Brnovich
2 Judge: Deborah M Fine
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER - This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot pursuant to General Order 17-08. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 10/8/19. (MSA)
October 4, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Francisco Barrios. (Knowlton, Keith)
September 17, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendants David R Hopkins, Phoenix, City of. (Griggs, James)
August 23, 2019 Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: Scheduling conference set for 10/4/2019 is vacated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (TCA)
August 23, 2019 Filing 8 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by David R Hopkins, Phoenix, City of. (Griggs, James)
August 23, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by David R Hopkins, Phoenix, City of.(Griggs, James)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/4/2019 at 08:45 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 8/19/2019. (TCA)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 8/19/2019. (TCA)
August 16, 2019 Filing 4 ***STATE RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Declaration of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate upon David R. Hopkins on 7/31/2019 and City of Phoenix on 7/26/2019. (originals filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 7/31/2019) (BAR) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.
August 16, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR)
August 16, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAR)
August 16, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-094544. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17290319 filed by David R Hopkins, Phoenix, City of.(Griggs, James) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(BAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barrios v. Phoenix, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Barrios
Represented By: Keith M Knowlton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David R Hopkins
Represented By: Cris A Meyer
Represented By: James Garrett Griggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phoenix, City of
Represented By: Cris A Meyer
Represented By: James Garrett Griggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?