Duarte v. Quijada et al
| Nicholas Duarte |
| Pima County, Arizona, Unknown Party, Daniel Quijada and Pima, County of |
| 2:2019cv04985 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles (PS) |
| Camille D Bibles |
| Steven P Logan |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/14/2019 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 10/9/19. (LAD)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot pursuant to General Order 17-08. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/7/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendants Pima, County of, Daniel Quijada. (Kramer, Clayton) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Clayton Robert Kramer. (Kramer, Clayton) |
|
Filing 5
PRELIMINARY ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 8/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(LMR)
|
| Filing 4 Defendants Quijada and Pima County's ANSWER to Complaint by Pima, County of, Daniel Quijada.(Davis, Nancy) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-010159. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-17293898 filed by Pima County, Arizona, Daniel Quijada. (Davis, Nancy) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A)(BAC) |
| ***STATE COURTS RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Process re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Clerk of the Board of Supervisors on 7/31/2019 (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 8/8/2019).(BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
