Bishop et al v. Pacific Indemnity Company

Plaintiff: Phillip Bishop and Kristy Bishop
Defendant: Pacific Indemnity Company
Case Number: 2:2019cv04999
Filed: August 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2019 Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kristy Bishop. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Traulsen, Richard)
August 21, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by Kristy Bishop. (Traulsen, Richard)
August 21, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #2 Summons Submitted filed by Kristy Bishop and Phillip Bishop. Summons is blank. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC)
August 21, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC)
August 21, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17305562. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Camille D Bibles. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4999-PHX-CDB. Magistrate Election form attached. (DLC)
August 21, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Kristy Bishop and Phillip Bishop. (Traulsen, Richard) (DLC)
August 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17305562 filed by Kristy Bishop and Phillip Bishop.(Traulsen, Richard) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bishop et al v. Pacific Indemnity Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Indemnity Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Bishop
Represented By: Mark Eugene Munson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristy Bishop
Represented By: Richard Phillip Traulsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?