Arky v. Arpaio et al
Plaintiff: Justin Tyler Arky
Defendant: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Vincent Campanaro and Joseph M Arpaio
Case Number: 2:2019cv05077
Filed: August 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Eileen S Willett (PS)
Referring Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2019 Filing 7 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Vincent Campanaro, Paul Penzone filed by Justin Tyler Arky. (7 pages) (REK)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Justin Tyler Arky. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 9/11/19. (SLQ)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 9/11/19. (SLQ)
August 30, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK)
August 30, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Justin Tyler Arky. (1 page) (REK)
August 30, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Justin Tyler Arky. (3 pages) (REK)
August 30, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Justin Tyler Arky. (7 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arky v. Arpaio et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Tyler Arky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Penzone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vincent Campanaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?