Camboni v. Brnovich et al
Anthony Camboni |
Michele Reagan, Angela Ducey, Unknown Hobbs, Mark Brnovich, State Bar of Arizona, Unknown Gates, Unknown Barton, Arizona, State of, Katie Hobbs, Janet Barton, David Reagan, Maricopa, County of, Pamela Gates, Susan Brnovich and Doug Ducey |
2:2019cv05091 |
September 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Steven P Logan |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with this Order no later than November 14, 2019. If Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, the amended complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens it pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects not to file an amended complaint by November 14, 2019, the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further order of this Court. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/15/19. (SLQ) |
Filing 7 Renewed APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Anthony Camboni. (REK) |
Filing 6 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff shall either pay the filing fee associated with this action or file a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis that addresses the discrepancies identified in this order no later than September 27, 2019. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this case without further order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the timeframe specified herein. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 9/6/19. (LAD) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REK) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (REK) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-05091-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Anthony Camboni. (REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anthony Camboni. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.