Vasquez #190697 v. Ryan et al
| Samuel Mario Vasquez |
| Stacey Crabtree, Stephen Morris, Joe Profiri, Pannan Days, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Party, A Quintero, Unknown Parties and David Shinn |
| 2:2019cv05158 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - The #8 First Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/5/19. (Attachments: #1 Instructions and Forms- Prisoner Civil Right Complaint)(MSA)
|
| Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Stacey Crabtree, Pannan Days, Stephen Morris, Joe Profiri, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Parties, A Quintero, Unknown Parties, David Shinn, Unknown Parties filed by Samuel Mario Vasquez. (SST) (17 pages) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER - The #1 Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Plaintiff's #5 Motion to Clarify to Correct the Record is granted. The Clerk of Court must update the docket to reflect the corrected prisoner identification number Plaintiff provides in the Motion to Clarify to Correct the Record. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/3/19. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint)(MSA)
|
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $400.00, receipt number PHX212320. (REK) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Clarify to Correct the Record by Samuel Mario Vasquez. (1 page) (MSA) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 9/17/19. (Attachments: #1 Instructions and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(MSA)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to Electronic Filing. Please see attached notice. (MSA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MSA) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Samuel Mario Vasquez. (8 pages)(MSA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
