Sedeno v. Maesalea-Hirata et al
| Noah A Sedeno |
| Jody P Maesalea-Hirata and Attorney General of the State of Hawaii |
| 2:2019cv05165 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court's Order filed September 18, 2019, judgment of dismissal is entered. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed. (LAD) |
Filing 3
ORDER - (1) The Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this case are dismissed. (2) The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. (3) Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/18/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Noah A Sedeno. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAD) (11 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
