Kraft v. Williams et al
Plaintiff: Rune Kraft
Defendant: Scott E Williams and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2019cv05181
Filed: September 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2019 Filing 29 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #28 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Scott E Williams. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 5.5(g) - Documents signed by an attorney shall be filed using that attorney's ECF log-in and password and shall not be filed using a log-in and password belonging to another attorney. Document(s) signed by attorney Scott Williams but submitted using the log-in and password belonging to attorney Melissa Parham. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ)
October 17, 2019 Filing 28 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Scott E Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Parham, Melissa)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk to seal the Defendant's Reply Re: Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #26 ) for the reason that it contains personal information identifiers. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file a redacted version of Document #26 and its attachments by October 17, 2019. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/15/19. (LAD)
October 14, 2019 Filing 26 * REPLY to Response to Motion re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Scott E Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Parham, Melissa) * Modified to SEAL per #27 Order on 10/15/2019 (LAD).
October 8, 2019 Filing 25 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #23 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Rune Kraft, #24 MOTION for Hearing or Conference MOTION to Compel filed by Rune Kraft, #22 Notice (Other) filed by Rune Kraft. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(1) - The name, address, email address, State Bar Attorney number, telephone number, and optionally fax number, of the attorney appearing for the party in the action or proceeding and whether the attorney appears for the plaintiff, defendant, or other party - in propira persona - must be typewritten or printed in the space to the left of the center of the page and beginning at line one (1) on the first page. The space to the right of the center must be reserved for the filing marks of the Clerk. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK)
October 7, 2019 Filing 24 *MOTION for Speedy Hearing, MOTION to Compel Local Attorneys to Produce Specific Things for the Purpose of Resolving this Controversy Speedily by Rune Kraft. (Kraft, Rune). *Added MOTION to Compel on 10/8/2019 (REK).
October 7, 2019 Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Rune Kraft. (Kraft, Rune)
October 7, 2019 Filing 22 NOTICE re: Notice of violation of court order (Document Number #9 ) by Rune Kraft . (Kraft, Rune)
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER that Plaintiff shall file with the Clerk of the Court and serve on opposing counsel a responsive memorandum to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #18 no later than October 25, 2019. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/07/2019. (REK)
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting #14 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/07/2019. (REK)
October 7, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Scott E Williams. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK)
October 4, 2019 Filing 18 *First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Scott E Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Motion to Dismiss)(Parham, Melissa) *Modified to correct motion type and add motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on 10/7/2019 (REK).
October 4, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE re: Notice of Certification of Conferral by Scott E Williams . (Parham, Melissa)
September 30, 2019 Filing 16 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Rune Kraft. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (REK)
September 30, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Service of #9 Order by Rune Kraft. (REK)
September 30, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Rune Kraft. (REK)
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying pro se Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #3 ). (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/30/19. (JAMA)
September 27, 2019 Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Rune Kraft: Declaration of Service re: #3 Motion for Summary Judgment, #4 Declaration in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, and #5 Declaration of EQX Technologies upon Scott Williams on 9/18/2019. (REK)
September 27, 2019 Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Rune Kraft: Summons and Complaint upon Scott Williams on 9/18/2019. (REK)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on December 17, 2019. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/18/19. (JAMA)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/18/19. (JAMA)
September 17, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (RMV)
September 17, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (RMV)
September 16, 2019 Filing 6 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-05181-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (RMV)
September 16, 2019 Filing 5 DECLARATION of EQX Technologies by Plaintiff Rune Kraft. (10 pages) (RMV)
September 16, 2019 Filing 4 DECLARATION in support of #3 Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Rune Kraft. (2 pages) (RMV)
September 16, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Rune Kraft. (5 pages) (RMV)
September 16, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Scott E Williams, issued over the counter to pro se plaintiff Rune Kraft. (RMV)
September 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number PHX212123 filed by Rune Kraft. (24 pages) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(RMV)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kraft v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott E Williams
Represented By: Scott Edward Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rune Kraft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?