Gallardo et al v. Stillwater Insurance Company et al
Joseph Gallardo and Angel Gallardo |
Stillwater Insurance Company and Unknown Parties |
2:2019cv05235 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Susan M Brnovich |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE - Acknowledgment of Receipt of Remand Letter. (SST) |
Filing 11 ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall remand this case to Maricopa County Superior Court and terminate this action. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 11/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter) (SST) |
Filing 10 *RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause by Stillwater Insurance Company re: #9 Re Amount in Controversy. (Sparks, J) *Modified to correct event; attorney noticed on 10/17/2019 (SLQ). |
Filing 9 ORDER:Defendants show cause in writing within seven days of the date of this Order why this case should not be remanded.Defendants fail to show cause in writing within seven days of the date of this Order, this case will be remanded without further notice. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 10/8/2019. (TCA) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: The Defendant having filed its Answer, the Clerk's Office will not take any action on the Plaintiffs' Application for Entry of Default (Doc. #5 ). This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (NKS) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Stillwater Insurance Company.(Sparks, J) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen E Silverman on behalf of Angel Gallardo, Joseph Gallardo. (Silverman, Stephen) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION for Entry of Default by Plaintiffs Angel Gallardo, Joseph Gallardo against Stillwater Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration on Default)(Silverman, Stephen) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17424774. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-05235-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Stillwater Insurance Company. (Sparks, J) (BAC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-011338. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-17424774 filed by Stillwater Insurance Company. (Sparks, J) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A MCSC Docs, #4 Exhibit B Sparks Decl, #5 Exhibit D Cert of Arb, #6 Exhibit D Cert of Arb, #7 Request for Jury Trial)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.