Wynn v. Shinn et al
| Willis Edward Wynn |
| Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn and Joseph Profiri |
| 2:2019cv05294 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Eileen S Willett |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #7 Response to Habeas Petition (State/2254) Index of Exhibits O-Q by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit O, #2 Exhibit P, #3 Exhibit Q)(Moody, Karen) |
| Filing 9 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #7 Response to Habeas Petition (State/2254) Index of Exhibits E-N by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E, #2 Exhibit F, #3 Exhibit G, #4 Exhibit H, #5 Exhibit I, #6 Exhibit J, #7 Exhibit K, #8 Exhibit L, #9 Exhibit M, #10 Exhibit N)(Moody, Karen) |
| Filing 8 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #7 Response to Habeas Petition (State/2254) Index of Exhibits A-D by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Moody, Karen) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn.(Moody, Karen) |
Filing 6
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall abide by the deadlines and requirements as outlined in this order. (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 10/18/19. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Karen Elizabeth Moody on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Joseph Profiri. (Moody, Karen) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 10/08/19. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim) |
|
Filing 3
Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254): The Clerk of Court shall update the docket to reflect that, pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Acting Director Joseph Profiri is substituted for Charles Ryan as a Respondent. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition #1 and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/07/2019. (Attachments: #1 Copy of 2254 Writ of Habeas Corpus) (REK)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MSA) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number PHX212590 filed by Willis Edward Wynn. (38 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MSA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
