Encon Arizona LLC v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company
Plaintiff: Encon Arizona LLC and Encon Arizona LLC a Colorado limited liability company doing business as TPAC
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Kiewit Infrastructure West Company
3Rd Party Defendant: Western Surety Company
Case Number: 2:2019cv05364
Filed: October 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Filing 18 Summons Issued as to Western Surety Company. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
December 4, 2019 Filing 17 SUMMONS Submitted by Kiewit Infrastructure West Company. (Allen, David)
November 20, 2019 Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kiewit Infrastructure West Company. (Bogard, Mark)
November 19, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Kiewit Infrastructure West Company. (MMO)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 2/5/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 606, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least 14 days before the Scheduling Conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 11/18/2019. (MMO)
November 18, 2019 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Encon Arizona LLC, Western Surety Company, COUNTERCLAIM against Encon Arizona LLC by Kiewit Infrastructure West Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Bogard, Mark)
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until 11/18/2019 for Defendant to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/30/2019. (MMO)
October 29, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Kiewit Infrastructure West Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Allen, David)
October 29, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David Lee Allen on behalf of Kiewit Infrastructure West Company. (Allen, David)
October 22, 2019 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Brad C Parrott and Anthony D Lehman on behalf of Plaintiff Encon Arizona LLC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
October 16, 2019 Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Encon Arizona LLC: Certificate of Service re: Summons & Complaint upon Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. on 10/14/19. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cordier, Michael)
October 16, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE re: Service by Encon Arizona LLC re: #7 Order re Rule 12(b) Motions upon Defendant Kiewit. (Cordier, Michael)
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/11/2019. (MMO)
October 10, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kiewit Infrastructure West Company. (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
October 10, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO)
October 10, 2019 Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17504941. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-5364-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO)
October 10, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Encon Arizona LLC. (Cordier, Michael) (MCO)
October 10, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Encon Arizona LLC. (Cordier, Michael) (MCO)
October 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17504941 filed by Encon Arizona LLC. (Cordier, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Encon Arizona LLC v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Encon Arizona LLC
Represented By: Richard B Murphy
Represented By: Chase E Halsey
Represented By: Anthony D Lehman
Represented By: Brad C Parrott
Represented By: Michael A Cordier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Encon Arizona LLC a Colorado limited liability company doing business as TPAC
Represented By: Richard B Murphy
Represented By: Chase E Halsey
Represented By: Anthony D Lehman
Represented By: Brad C Parrott
Represented By: Michael A Cordier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: Kiewit Infrastructure West Company
Represented By: Mark D Bogard
Represented By: David Lee Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: Western Surety Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?