Scott v. Penzone
| LaVoy Scott, II |
| Paul Penzone |
| 2:2019cv05407 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| James F Metcalf |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER that within seven days of the filing of this Order, Plaintiff shall either: (1) return a completed service packet as previously ordered; or (2) show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge James F Metcalf on 12/03/2019. (REK)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER that within seven days of the filing of this Order, Plaintiff shall either: (1) return a completed service packet as previously ordered; or (2) show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge James F Metcalf on 11/18/2019. (REK)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PARTY'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS by LaVoy Scott, II: 13407 N 24th Ln., Phoenix, AZ 85029. (1 page) (REK) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of LaVoy Scott, II. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/18/2019. (RMV)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Service Packet): Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $12.33. Defendant Penzone must answer the Complaint in his official capacity. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. #1 ), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Penzone. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/18/2019. (RMV)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LaVoy Scott, II. (2 pages) (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by LaVoy Scott, II. (3 pages) (REK) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by LaVoy Scott, II. (7 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. Penzone | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Paul Penzone | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LaVoy Scott, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
