Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Toni Taylor |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2019cv05520 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed with leave to amend.Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and Amended Application to proceed in forma pauperis are due within sixty (60) days of the date she receives this Order. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 12/17/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: Document #4 was entered in error. This case is exempt from the pilot program. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (WLP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (WLP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (WLP) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-5520-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (WLP) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Toni Taylor. (WLP) |
| Filing 1 **DISMISSED PER DOC. 7* COMPLAINT filed by Toni Taylor.(WLP) Modified on 12/18/2019 (TCA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Toni Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
