Brisken v. Barajas et al
| Jhon Nigel Brisken |
| Justin Weiss, B Greigo, Unknown Tanafara, T Thomas, Unknown Leara, Juan Valenzuela, Unknown Barajas, Unknown Pour and B Griego |
| 2:2019cv05569 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a current certified six-month trust account statement. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/17/19. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jhon Nigel Brisken. (2 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jhon Nigel Brisken. (2 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Jhon Nigel Brisken. (17 pages) (Attachments: #1 envelope)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
