Forbes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Eric David Forbes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2019cv05609
Filed: November 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2019 Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Eric David Forbes: Proof of Service re: Summons&Complaint Eric David Forbes upon U.S. Atty's Office on 11/18/19, Commissioner of Social Security on 11/18/19, U.S. Attorney General on 11/19/19. (Attachments: #1 Commissioner summons exec w proof of service, #2 US Atty Gen Summons exec w proof of service)(Ayodele, Elizabeth) *Modified text on 12/27/2019 (DXD).
November 26, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Asim Modi appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Modi, Asim)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties must fully comply with the deadlines and procedures set forth in this order. See document for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/13/2019. (RMV)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on February 11, 2020. See document for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/13/2019. (RMV)
November 13, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (WLP)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefore. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/12/19. (SLQ)
November 12, 2019 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G. Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-5609-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP)
November 12, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Eric David Forbes. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (KEP)
November 12, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Eric David Forbes. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (KEP)
November 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Eric David Forbes. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forbes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric David Forbes
Represented By: Elizabeth Oluwafunmi Ayodele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Asim Modi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?