San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Azar et al
Plaintiff: San Carlos Apache Tribe
Defendant: Alex Azar, United States of America and Michael Weahkee
Case Number: 2:2019cv05624
Filed: November 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2019 Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by San Carlos Apache Tribe: Affidavit of Service re: Summons and Complaint, Notice re: MIDPP, and Order re: FRCP 12(b) & (c) Motions upon Defendants on November 21 and 22, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return Receipts, #2 Exhibit USPS Online Verification)(Miller, Lloyd)
November 18, 2019 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Alex Azar, Michael Weahkee, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(BAS)
November 15, 2019 Filing 10 SUMMONS Submitted by San Carlos Apache Tribe. (Ritchie, Alexander)
November 15, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Submitted by San Carlos Apache Tribe. (Ritchie, Alexander)
November 15, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Submitted by San Carlos Apache Tribe. (Ritchie, Alexander)
November 15, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by San Carlos Apache Tribe. (Ritchie, Alexander)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 11/14/19. (SLQ)
November 15, 2019 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Lloyd B Miller and Rebecca A Patterson on behalf of Plaintiff San Carlos Apache Tribe. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
November 14, 2019 Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff San Carlos Apache Tribe. (Ritchie, Alexander)
November 14, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by San Carlos Apache Tribe. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file the Civil Cover Sheet. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC)
November 14, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC)
November 14, 2019 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17632393. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Senior Judge Neil V Wake. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-05624-PHX-NVW. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC)
November 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-17632393 filed by San Carlos Apache Tribe. (Ritchie, Alexander) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1, 2007 IHS Manual, Pt. 6, Ch. 3, Part 1, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit Ex. 2, 9/28/17 Claim Letter, #4 Exhibit Ex. 3, 7/10/19 Decision & Counterclaim)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Azar et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: San Carlos Apache Tribe
Represented By: Rebecca A Patterson
Represented By: Alexander Bennett Ritchie
Represented By: Lloyd B Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alex Azar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Weahkee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?