Hurley v. Go Daddy Incorporated et al
Patrick J Hurley |
Go Daddy Incorporated, Microsoft Corporation, GoDaddy Operating Company LLC, Go Daddy East, LLC, Unknown Parties, Go Daddy India, LLC and GoDaddy.com LLC |
2:2019cv05635 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Diane J Humetewa |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice or order from the Court, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on February 13, 2020. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 11/18/2019. (CLB) |
Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff serve a copy of this Order upon Defendants and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 11/18/19. (CLB) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (WLP) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (WLP) |
Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-05635-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (WLP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number PHX214063 filed by Patrick J Hurley.(WLP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.