Ivchenko v. Scottsdale, City of et al
Renee Ivchenko |
Maricopa County, Sean Charles Ryan, Paul Penzone, Timothy Michael Dearing, Brandon Treglown, Scottsdale, City of and Thomas Michael Dearing |
2:2019cv05834 |
December 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Deborah M Fine (PS) |
Deborah M Fine |
Roslyn O Silver |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand [ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY AND SHERIFF PAUL PENZONE] by Maricopa County, Paul Penzone.(Trullinger, Charles) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #12 Summons Submitted filed by Renee Ivchenko. Defendants named on summons do not match names on amended complaint. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Submitted by Renee Ivchenko. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Tate, Elizabeth) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Maricopa County, Paul Penzone, Sean Charles Ryan, Scottsdale, City of, Brandon Treglown, Thomas Michael Dearing filed by Renee Ivchenko.(Tate, Elizabeth) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Renee Ivchenko . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Tate, Elizabeth) |
Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Renee Ivchenko: Proof of Service re: complaint summons upon Brandon Treglown on January 13, 2020. (Tate, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Renee Ivchenko: Proof of Service re: complaint summons upon Sheriff Paul Penzone on January 13, 2020. (Tate, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Renee Ivchenko: Proof of Service re: complaint summons upon Maricopa County on January 13, 2020. (Tate, Elizabeth) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Timothy Michael Dearing, Maricopa County, Paul Penzone, Sean Charles Ryan, Scottsdale, City of, Brandon Treglown. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Renee Ivchenko. (Tate, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(BAC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-17744424 filed by Renee Ivchenko. (Tate, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.