Bartlett v. Penzone et al
| Alan Michael Bartlett |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Paul Penzone |
| 2:2019cv05897 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed February 20, 2020, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2254, which the Court construed as a Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241, is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed. (REK) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is granted. Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254, which the Court construes as a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 #1 and this case are dismissed. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 2/20/2020. (REK)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Alan Michael Bartlett. (2 pages) (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Alan Michael Bartlett. (2 pages) (REK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Alan Michael Bartlett. (60 pages and envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
