Jones v. Grand Canyon Ventures LLC et al
Brandee Jones |
Grand Canyon Ventures LLC, Marco Stalteri, Unknown Stalteri, Thomas J McMahan, Vincenzo Stalteri, Unknown McMahan, Michael J Shelton, Unknown Shelton and Grand Canyon Ventures LLC an Arizona Limited Liability Company doing business as Siderno Bakery |
2:2019cv05910 |
December 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Camille D Bibles |
Michael T Morrissey |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: This case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael T. Morrissey. All future documents filed shall reflect the revised case number of CV19-5910-PHX-MTM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SJF) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: That counsel having complied with this Court's Order, the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for February 18, 2020 is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 8 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 6 Order that Brandee Jones show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 2/18/2020 at 04:30 PM before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Grand Canyon Ventures LLC, Vincenzo Stalteri, Unknown Stalteri(named as Jane Doe, a married couple), Marco Stalteri, Unknown Stalteri(named as Jane Doe (II), a married couple),Thomas J McMahan, Unknown McMahan, Michael J Shelton, and Unknown Shelton. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MYE) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17780254. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Camille D Bibles. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-5910-PHX-CDB. Magistrate Election form attached. (MYE) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Brandee Jones. (Bendau, Clifford) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(MYE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17780254 filed by Brandee Jones. (Bendau, Clifford) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.