Thompson v. Blum et al
| Richard Wayne Thompson |
| Scott Blum, Sandra Schutz, James Haas and Kathy Whalen |
| 2:2019cv05929 |
| December 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed February 24, 2020, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed. (GMP) |
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs is granted. Plaintiff is not required to pay the filing fees for this action. The #1 Complaint and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and finds Plaintiff may appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 2/24/20. (GMP)
|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: The referral judge assignment on this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael T. Morrissey. Please substitute the initials (MTM) for (MHB) in the case number for all future filings. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 14 ) is denied. This action must remain closed. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 01/21/2020. (SST)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Consolidate by Richard Wayne Thompson. (Associated Cases: CV-18-4554-PHX-DJH (MHB), CV-19-291-PHX-DJH (MHB), CV-19-5929-PHX-DJH (MHB), CV-20-18-PHX-DJH (MHB)) (LAD) |
| Filing 6 ***Entered in wrong case. NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (WLP) Modified on 1/8/2020 to reflect entry in wrong case (WLP). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (HLA) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (HLA) Modified on 1/2/2020 (HLA). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (HLA) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Wayne Thompson. (5 pages) (HLA) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Richard Wayne Thompson. (40 pages)(HLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
