Digital Media Solutions LLC et al v. South University of Ohio LLC et al
Digital Media Solutions LLC |
South University of Ohio LLC, DCEH Education Holdings LLC, South University, Dream Center Education Holdings LLC, Argosy Education Group LLC and DC South University of Ohio LLC |
Mark E Dottore |
2:2019mc00001 |
January 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER re: #1 Miscellaneous Case Opening Regarding COMPLAINT FOR RECEIVERSHIP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 754 filed by Mark E Dottore from United States District Court Northern District of Ohio case number 1:19-cv-145-DAP. Signed by United States District Judge Christopher A Boyko for United States District Judge Dan A Polster on January 18, 2019. (BAS) |
Filing 2 Notice of Order Appointing Receiver Pursuant to 28 USC 754 by Mark E Dottore from the United States District, Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 1:19-cv-145-DAP. (BAS) |
Filing 1 Miscellaneous Case Opening Regarding: COMPLAINT FOR RECEIVERSHIP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 754 filed by Mark E Dottore (the receiver) from the United States District Court Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 1:19-cv-145-DAP. Case Opening Fee Received: $ 47.00 receipt number PHX204834 filed by Digital Media Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 letter)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.