Securities and Exchange Commission v. Direct Lending Investments LLC
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Direct Lending Investments LLC |
| Bradley D Sharp |
| 2:2019mc00007 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER and ORDER Appointing Permanent Receiver re: #1 COMPLAINT FOR RECEIVERSHIP filed by Securities and Exchange Commission from United States District Court, Central District of California, case number: 2:19-cv-2188-PHX-DSF-MRW. Signed by Judge Dale S. Fisher on 04/01/2019. (HLA)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE re: #1 COMPLAINT FOR RECEIVERSHIP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 754 from United States District Court, Central District of California, case number: 2:19-cv-2188-PHX-DSF-MRW, and Request for the Issuance of a Miscellaneous Number filed by Bradley D. Sharp. ( |
| Filing 1 Miscellaneous Case Opening Regarding: 28 U.S.C. 754 COMPLAINT FOR RECEIVERSHIP. Case Opening Fee Received: $ 47.00 receipt number PHX207280 filed by Securities and Exchange Commission from United States District Court, Central District of California, case number: 2:19-cv-2188-PHX-DSF-MRW. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(HLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
