Axon Enterprise Incorporated v. Federal Trade Commission et al
| Axon Enterprise Incorporated |
| Rebecca Slaughter, Joseph Simons, Noah Phillips, Federal Trade Commission, Christine Wilson and Rohit Chopra |
| 2:2020cv00014 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Other Statutes: Anti-Trust |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #22 MOTION to Expedite Hearing and Consideration of Preliminary Injunction Motion filed by Rohit Chopra, Federal Trade Commission, Noah Phillips, Joseph Simons, Rebecca Slaughter, Christine Wilson. (Craigmyle, Bradley) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to Expedite Hearing and Consideration of Preliminary Injunction Motion by Axon Enterprise Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Petersen, Pamela) |
| Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Axon Enterprise Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Petersen, Pamela) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE re: Notice of Change of Contact Information by Axon Enterprise Incorporated . (Petersen, Pamela) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re: #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Rohit Chopra, Federal Trade Commission, Noah Phillips, Joseph Simons, Rebecca Slaughter, Christine Wilson. (Craigmyle, Bradley) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Bradley Craigmyle appearing for Rohit Chopra, Federal Trade Commission, Noah Phillips, Joseph Simons, Rebecca Slaughter, Christine Wilson. . (Craigmyle, Bradley) |
| Filing 17 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Axon Enterprise Incorporated: Declaration of Service re: Summons; Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief; Preliminary Order dated January 7, 2020; Notice to Parties-Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project; Mandatory Initial Discovery Users' Manual for the District of Arizona; Civil Cover Sheet; Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement; and Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities (Supplemental Declaration of Service to ECF 16) upon Federal Trade Commission; Joseph Simons; Rebecca Slaughter; Christine Wilson; Noah Phillips; Rohit Chopra; Michael Bailey; William P. Barr on January 13, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Direnfeld, Jonathan) |
| Filing 16 * SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Axon Enterprise Incorporated: Declaration of Service re: Summons; Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief; Preliminary Order dated January 7, 2020; Notice to Parties-Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project; Mandatory Initial Discovery Users' Manual for the District of Arizona; Civil Cover Sheet; Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement; and Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities upon Federal Trade Commission; Joseph Simons; Rebecca Slaughter; Christine Wilson; Noah Phillips; Rohit Chopra on 1/9/2020 (summons and complaint) and mailed motion for preliminary injunction and supporting memorandum on 1/10/2020; copies of summons and complaint were mailed by certified mail to Michael Bailey on 1/10/2020 and to William P. Barr on January 9, 2020 and mailed motion for preliminary injunction and supporting memorandum January 10, 2020, Postal Service delivery confirmation or signed PS Form 3811 not provided for Bailey or Barr, per Declaration. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Direnfeld, Jonathan) * Modified to add text; attorney noticed on 1/13/2020 (LAD). |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Jonathan Adler Direnfeld on behalf of Plaintiff Axon Enterprise Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Antony P Kim on behalf of Plaintiff Axon Enterprise Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Garret Garretson Rasmussen on behalf of Plaintiff Axon Enterprise Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities by Axon Enterprise Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Petersen, Pamela) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Thomas King-Sun Fu on behalf of Plaintiff Axon Enterprise Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 14
PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on April 6, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 3. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/7/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice - MIDP, #2 MIDP User Manual)(MAW)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Dominic W Lanza. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-20-0014-PHX-DWL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 12 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Axon Enterprise Incorporated. (Petersen, Pamela) |
| Filing 9 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint Corrected Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Axon Enterprise Incorporated. (Petersen, Pamela) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Axon Enterprise Incorporated. (BAC) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Axon Enterprise Incorporated. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile the Civil Cover Sheet, using the correct format. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Axon Enterprise Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rohit Chopra, Federal Trade Commission, Noah Phillips, Joseph Simons, Rebecca Slaughter, Christine Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17790993. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00014-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached.(BAC) |
| Filing 2 *Summons Submitted by Axon Enterprise Incorporated. (Petersen, Pamela) *Modified to correct event type and text on 1/3/2020 (BAC). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-17790993 filed by Axon Enterprise Incorporated. (Petersen, Pamela) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
