Palko v. TransUnion
Susan Palko and Susan Plako |
TransUnion |
2:2020cv00029 |
January 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to #7 Order, Civil Case Terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA) |
Filing 9 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on April 7, 2020. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/8/2020. (JAMA) |
Filing 8 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/8/2020. (JAMA) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ). Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $400.00 within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order or this action will be terminated. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to terminate this action without further notice or Order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to pay the Court's filing fee within the time stated above. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/8/2020. (RMV) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (HLA) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (HLA) |
Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00029-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (HLA) |
Filing 3 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Susan Palko. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (HLA) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Susan Palko. (HLA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Susan Palko.(HLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.