Pyland v. Bennett et al
Plaintiff: Chad Pyland
Defendant: Stuart Lee Bennett, Riverbar LLC and Riverbar LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Bar
Case Number: 2:2020cv00063
Filed: January 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER as to #9 MOTION for Default Hearing: Motion Hearing set for 3/20/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/3/20. (LAD)
February 6, 2020 Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Stuart Lee Bennett - Pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and upon application by the Plaintiff, default is hereby entered against Defendant Stuart Lee Bennett. (EJA)
February 6, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #9 Motion for Hearing filed by Chad Pyland, #8 Application for Entry of Default filed by Chad Pyland. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (EJA)
February 5, 2020 Filing 9 *MOTION for Default Hearing by Plaintiff Chad Pyland. (Udall, William) *Modified to correct event type on 2/6/2020 (EJA).
February 5, 2020 Filing 8 APPLICATION for Entry of Default by Plaintiff Chad Pyland against Stuart Lee Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Affidavit Affidavit in Support)(Udall, William)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER/NOTICE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P.4(m): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on April 10, 2020. (See Order for details.) Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 01/10/2020. (SST)
January 10, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Stuart Lee Bennett, Riverbar LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
January 10, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Chad Pyland. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP)
January 10, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP)
January 10, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17820248. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G. Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-63-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP)
January 10, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Chad Pyland. (Udall, William) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(KEP)
January 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17820248 filed by Chad Pyland. (Udall, William) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pyland v. Bennett et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stuart Lee Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Riverbar LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Riverbar LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Bar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Pyland
Represented By: William Addison Udall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?