Winters v. Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated
| Richard Winters, Jr. |
| Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated |
| 2:2020cv00168 |
| January 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #10 Amended Complaint Due to Exigent Circumstances by Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Urias, Sharon) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Roy Taub on behalf of Defendant Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated filed by Richard Winters, Jr.(McBride, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Richard Winters, Jr . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Redlined FAC)(McBride, Ryan) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Jeffrey Aaron Backman on behalf of Defendant Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' stipulation (Doc. #7 ) and granting Defendant a one-time extension of time until March 26, 2020, to respond to the complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's response to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/26/20. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW) Modified on 2/26/2020 to reflect NEF regenerated to Mr. Backman(SJF).
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Urias, Sharon) |
|
Filing 6
PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on April 22, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 3. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/27/20. (MAW)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17863592. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-168-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Richard Winters, Jr. (McBride, Ryan) (DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17863592 filed by Richard Winters, Jr. (McBride, Ryan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Winters v. Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Winters, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Lee McBride |
| Represented By: | David James McGlothlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Grand Caribbean Cruises Incorporated | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
