Ellis v. Circle K Stores Incorporated et al
| Gregory Micheal Ellis |
| Circle K Stores Incorporated, Phoenix City District Attorney's Office, Phoenix Police Department and Phoenix Municipal Court |
| 2:2020cv00228 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Nature of Suit Code be updated to 550. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case must be randomly referred to a Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1). IT IS FURTHER ORDEREED that this matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot pursuant to General Order 17-08. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/18/2020. (WLP)
|
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Circle K Stores Incorporated, Phoenix City District Attorney's Office, Phoenix Police Department, Phoenix Municipal Court filed by Gregory Micheal Ellis. (11 pages) (WLP) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. ORDERED that Plaintiff's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file a First Amended Complaint on or before March 6, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not comply on or before March 6, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall dismiss this action without further order of this Court. If Plaintiff elects to file a First Amended Complaint, it may not be served until and unless the Court issues an Order screening the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 2/4/2020. (LFIG)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (RMV) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (RMV) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00228-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (RMV) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gregory Micheal Ellis. (5 pages) (RMV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gregory Micheal Ellis. (6 pages)(RMV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
