Serna v. Arizona Lighting LLC et al
Plaintiff: Aldo Serna
Defendant: Candice Arnett, Arizona Lighting LLC and Jeff Arnett
Case Number: 2:2020cv00313
Filed: February 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION to Strike #8 Answer to Complaint Affirmative Defenses 1-21 by Aldo Serna. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barrat, Jason)
April 6, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Arizona Lighting LLC. (KFZ)
March 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 *ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE for 5/29/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. See document for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/27/2020. (WLP) *NEF regenerated on 3/30/2020 (CEI).
March 27, 2020 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Arizona Lighting LLC, Candice Arnett, Jeff Arnett.(Parmelee, Jay)
March 3, 2020 Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Aldo Serna: Acceptance of Service re: SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION, VERIFIED COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO PARTIES, GENERAL ORDER, MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY, ORDER upon Defendants on 20.02.28. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Barrat, Jason)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER/NOTICE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 4(m) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on May 12, 2020. (See document for further details). Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 2/11/2020. (LAD)
February 11, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Arizona Lighting LLC, Candice Arnett, and Jeff Arnett. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
February 11, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MYE)
February 10, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17938688. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-313-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE)
February 10, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Aldo Serna. (Barrat, Jason) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE)
February 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17938688 filed by Aldo Serna. (Barrat, Jason) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Serna v. Arizona Lighting LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aldo Serna
Represented By: Jason Saul Barrat
Represented By: Michael David Zoldan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Candice Arnett
Represented By: Brad Alan Denton
Represented By: Jay Frank Parmelee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Lighting LLC
Represented By: Brad Alan Denton
Represented By: Jay Frank Parmelee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Arnett
Represented By: Brad Alan Denton
Represented By: Jay Frank Parmelee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?