Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Auto Glass Express LLC et al
GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO Indemnity Company |
Danielle Dean, Saxton Lafasto, Auto Glass Express LLC and Auto Glass Express LLC doing business as AG Express |
2:2020cv00373 |
February 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Susan M Brnovich |
Other Statutes: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. § 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Auto Glass Express LLC, Danielle Dean, Saxton Lafasto. (Broberg, Lance) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Saxton Lafasto, Auto Glass Express LLC, Danielle Dean. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List of Known Claims)(Broberg, Lance) |
![]() |
Filing 15 *STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Auto Glass Express LLC, Danielle Dean, Saxton Lafasto. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bode, Timothy) *Modified to correct event type on 4/8/2020 (EJA). |
Filing 14 *NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Christian Bode and Lance Robert Broberg on behalf of Auto Glass Express LLC, Danielle Dean, Saxton Lafasto. (Bode, Timothy) *Modified to add attorney on 4/8/2020 (EJA). |
Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint upon Saxton Lafasto on March 18, 2020. (Thorpe, William) |
Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint upon Danielle N. Dean on March 18, 2020. (Thorpe, William) |
Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint upon Auto Glass Express LLC on March 18, 2020. (Thorpe, William) |
Remark: Out of state attorneys Max Gershenoff and Jeffrey Murphy removed for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Barry I Levy and Steven Henesy on behalf of Plaintiffs GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, and Government Employees Insurance Company. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (DLC) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Auto Glass Express LLC, Danielle Dean, Saxton Lafasto. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
Filing 4 *NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (DLC) *Modified on 2/20/2020 to reflect NOD issued in error. (DLC). |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17972348. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-373-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Thorpe, William) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(DLC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17972348 filed by GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company. (Thorpe, William) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 of 5, #3 Exhibit 2-5)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.