Jean v. United States Postal Service
Jessie Jean |
United States Postal Service |
2:2020cv00389 |
February 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Michael T Liburdi |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed March 5, 2020, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, against Plaintiff, and the complaint and this action are dismissed with prejudice. (SST) |
Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), the Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk is kindly directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant, against Plaintiff, and to terminate this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) is denied as moot. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 03/05/2020. (SST) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SST) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SST) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00389-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SST) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jessie Jean. (SST) (5 pages) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jessie Jean. (SST) (3 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jean v. United States Postal Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jessie Jean | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.