Connolly et al v. Boeing Company et al
| Cheri Kelkourse-Baker and Sierra Connolly |
| Boeing Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| 2:2020cv00461 |
| March 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Personal Injury: Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 SEALED LODGED Proposed Declaration of Christopher S. Coleman and Exhibit A re: #20 MOTION to Seal Document [Motion to Dismiss, Declaration of Christopher S. Coleman & Exhibit A]. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation to Seal is granted. Filed by Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Stratford, Barry) |
| Filing 21 SEALED LODGED Proposed Boeing's Motion to Dismiss re: #20 MOTION to Seal Document [Motion to Dismiss, Declaration of Christopher S. Coleman & Exhibit A]. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation to Seal is granted. Filed by Boeing Company. (Stratford, Barry) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to Seal Document [Motion to Dismiss, Declaration of Christopher S. Coleman & Exhibit A] by Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stratford, Barry) |
| Filing 19 DECLARATION of Christopher S. Coleman [REDACTED] re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [REDACTED] by Defendant Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Stratford, Barry) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [REDACTED] by Boeing Company. (Stratford, Barry) |
Filing 17
ORDER: Pending before the Court is the parties' Stipulation to Extend Time to Make MIDP Disclosures and Request to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference (First Request) (Doc. #16 ). For good cause showing, the Court will approve the parties' stipulations to extend their MIDP disclosure deadline to June 29, 2020 and their deadline to produce Electronically Stored Information ("ESI") to August 8, 2020. However, the Court does not find cause to continue the parties' June 4, 2020 Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, and thus will deny that request. The Court's Order requires that the parties provide the Court with "[a] discussion of the parties' compliance to date with the MIDP" prior to the scheduled conference. (Doc. #9 ). It does not require that these disclosures are necessarily made before a scheduling conference can be held. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Order setting the parties' Rule 16 Scheduling Conference (Doc. #9 ) is affirmed. ORDERED by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 4/20/2020. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LFIG)
|
| Filing 16 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time Stipulation to Extend Time to Make MIDP Disclosures and Request to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Katt, William) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Jeffery S Clackley on behalf of Defendant Boeing Company. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Out of state attorney Jeffery S Clackley removed as counsel of record for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Michael E Scoville on behalf of Defendant Boeing Company. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for William J Katt, John P Loringer and David A Frank, II on behalf of Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Allin, Taylor) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Lockheed Martin Corporation.(Allin, Taylor) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting the #11 Motion and a one-time extension of time until 5/1/2020 for Defendant Boeing Company to respond to the complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/20/2020. (LFIG)
|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Boeing Company. (Stratford, Barry) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time (Unopposed) to Respond to Complaint (First Request) by Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stratford, Barry) |
| Filing 10 *NOTICE re: of Service of Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by Sierra Connolly, Cheri Kelkourse-Baker re: #9 Order. (Loranger, Timothy) *Modified to add additional filer on 3/18/2020 (REK). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference is set for 6/4/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J Humetewa. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/12/2020. (LMR)
|
| Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Sierra Connolly: Proof of Service re: Summons upon Lockheed Martin Corporation on 03/11/2020. (Loranger, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Sierra Connolly: Proof of Service re: Summons upon The Boeing Company on 03/11/2020. (Loranger, Timothy) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Timothy A Loranger and Ronald Laurence Goldman on behalf of Plaintiffs Sierra Connolly and Cheri Kelkourse-Baker. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Clay Robbins, III on behalf of Plaintiffs Sierra Connolly and Cheri Kelkourse-Baker. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/4/2020. (CLB)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (REK) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18025818. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J. Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00461-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Sierra Connolly, Cheri Kelkourse-Baker. (submitted by C Combs) (Attachments: #1 Summons) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18025818 filed by Cheri Kelkourse-Baker, Sierra Connolly. (submitted by C Combs) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
