Salazar v. Thunderbird Collection Specialists Incorporated
Plaintiff: Consuelo Salazar
Defendant: Thunderbird Collection Specialists Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2020cv00643
Filed: March 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle
Referring Judge: Michael T Liburdi
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2020 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Michael T Liburdi. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-20-643-PHX-MTL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
April 6, 2020 Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
April 1, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Thunderbird Collection Specialists Incorporated. (MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
April 1, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MYE)
March 31, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18132126. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John Z Boyle. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-643-PHX-JZB. Magistrate Election form attached. (MYE)
March 31, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Consuelo Salazar. (McBride, Ryan) (MYE)
March 31, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18132126 filed by Consuelo Salazar. (McBride, Ryan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salazar v. Thunderbird Collection Specialists Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Consuelo Salazar
Represented By: Ryan Lee McBride
Represented By: David James McGlothlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thunderbird Collection Specialists Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?