Saini v. Barr
Petitioner: Parvinder Singh Saini
Respondent: William P Barr
Case Number: 2:2020cv00649
Filed: March 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James F Metcalf (PS)
Referring Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Alien Detainee - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2020 Filing 30 USCA Case Number re: #29 Notice of Appeal. Case number 20-16011, Ninth Circuit. (LAD)
May 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER of USCA construing the petition for review 20-71264 as a notice of appeal. The Clerk shall transfer the petition to the clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona for docketing as a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal shall be deemed filed in the district court on May 4, 2020. Upon transfer, the Clerk will close petition No. 20-71264. (See document for further details). (LAD)
May 26, 2020 Filing 27 USCA Case Number re: Petition for Review, Ninth Circuit Case number 20-71264. (LAD)
May 4, 2020 Filing 29 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #25 Clerks Judgment, #24 Order by Parvinder Singh Saini (pursuant to 20-71264, #28 Order of USCA). (LAD)
April 13, 2020 Filing 26 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons/Petition/Order upon William Barr on 4/9/20. (SST)
April 9, 2020 Filing 25 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed April 9, 2020, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed. (DXD)
April 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER - Petitioner's "Motion for an Emergency Request for Immediate Release of Petitioner Varinder Singh," construed as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241, is denied and this action is dismissed. The Clerk shall enter Judgement accordingly and terminate this case. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Petition (Doc. #22 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/9/20. (DXD)
April 8, 2020 Filing 23 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons/Petition/Order upon the U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona (attn: civil processing clerk) on 4/7/20. (SST)
April 8, 2020 Filing 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #21 Supplement (First Request) by William P Barr. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Branch, Katherine)
April 8, 2020 Filing 21 SUPPLEMENT update to writ of habeas by Petitioner Parvinder Singh Saini. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A & B)(Sarin, Garish)
April 8, 2020 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Garish Sarin on behalf of Petitioner Parvinder Singh Saini. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER - Petitioner shall have until 12:00 p.m. on Monday, 4/6/20 to file an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). Respondent shall have until 5:00pm on Wednesday, 4/8/20 to file an Answer to the Amended Petition. Petitioner shall have until 5:00 p.m. on Friday, 4/10/20 to file a Reply to Respondent's answer. The Court will set a hearing on this matter by separate order if necessary. The Clerk shall email a copy of this Order to the Immigration TRO Distribution List. The Clerk shall serve: a copy of the Summons, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #15 ), and this Order upon the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, the United States Attorney General and to Respondent by certified mail. Petitioner must immediately file a "Notice of Change in Status" with the Clerk of Court if there is any material change in his custody status. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/3/20. (DXD)
April 2, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION: Katherine R. Branch appearing for William P Barr. Attorney Abigail Evelyn Leach terminated. . (Branch, Katherine)
April 1, 2020 Filing 17 Letter from US District Court Phoenix to All Parties/Counsel of Record regarding receipt of case transferred from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, CA Number 19-72571. (LAD)
March 31, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD)
March 31, 2020 Filing 15 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; Case Number 19-72571. Original file with documents numbered 1, 10, 12, 13 and 14, copy of transfer order and docket sheet received filed by Parvinder Singh Saini. (Attachments: #1 Document 1 at 9CCA, #2 Document 10 at 9CCA, #3 Document 12 at 9CCA, #4 Document 13 at 9CCA, #5 Docket Sheet at Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)(LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saini v. Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Parvinder Singh Saini
Represented By: Garish Sarin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William P Barr
Represented By: Katherine R Branch
Represented By: Abigail Evelyn Leach
Represented By: Abigail E Leach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?