Ivchenko et al v. Grant et al
| Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 7, John Doe 9, John Doe 12, John Doe 8, John Doe 5, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 8, John Doe 11, John Doe 6, Renee Ivchenko, John Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, John Doe 2, John Doe 10, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 6 and Andrew Ivchenko |
| Kyle David Grant, Unknown Parties, Mariel Lizette Grant, Travis Paul Grant, Jane Doe Grant and Mariel Lizette Grant d/b/a Rapsheets.org and Bailbondcity.com |
| 2:2020cv00674 |
| April 3, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting the Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Plaintiffs to File Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #16 ). The deadline for Plaintiffs to file a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #14 ) is extended to 6/5/2020. There will be no further extensions absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 5/26/2020. (RMW)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Motion to Extend Time for Plaintiffs to File Reply in Support of Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss by Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, John Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, Andrew Ivchenko, Renee Ivchenko. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Endres, Paxton) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice and Stay Proceedings filed by Kyle David Grant, Mariel Lizette Grant, Travis Paul Grant. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of David S. Gingras In Support of Defendants' Request for Attorney's Fees)(Gingras, David) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice and Stay Proceedings by Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, John Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, Andrew Ivchenko, Renee Ivchenko. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice and Stay Proceedings, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Motion to Stay)(Endres, Paxton) |
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Telephonic Scheduling Conference presently set for Thursday, 5/14/2020, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court enters a Scheduling Order to govern the litigation in this case. Fact Discovery due by 2/12/2021. Dispositive motions due by 3/19/2021. See attached order for complete details. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 5/5/2020. (RMW)
|
| Filing 12 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Joint Case Management Plan filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, John Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, Andrew Ivchenko, Renee Ivchenko. (Ferrucci, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery Requests filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, John Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, Andrew Ivchenko, Renee Ivchenko. (Ferrucci, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE re: Withdrawal of Pending Motion by Jane Doe Grant, Kyle David Grant, Mariel Lizette Grant, Travis Paul Grant re: #9 Notice (Other) . (Gingras, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE re: Notice of Pending Motion by Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, John Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, Andrew Ivchenko, Renee Ivchenko . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Ferrucci, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendants Kyle David Grant, Mariel Lizette Grant, Travis Paul Grant. (Gingras, David) |
| Filing 7 REPLY BRIEF by Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, John Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, Andrew Ivchenko, Renee Ivchenko PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Ferrucci, David) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for Thursday, 5/14/2020 at 10:00 AM. The parties are directed to place a joint call to the Court to (602) 322-7655 at the time set for the hearing. The parties must jointly file the Joint Proposed Case Management Report with the Clerk of the Court at least 10 days before the Scheduling Conference. See attached order for additional information. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 4/7/2020. (RMW)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MSA) |
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. Filing fee of $400.00 paid. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00674-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MSA) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym and Memorandun in Support by Kyle David Grant, Mariel Lizette Grant, Travis Paul Grant. (MSA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Pending Motion by Kyle David Grant, Mariel Lizette Grant, Travis Paul Grant. (Submitted by David S Gringas) (MSA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-015355. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18144371 filed by Mariel Lizette Grant, Kyle David Grant, Travis Paul Grant. (David Gingras) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(GMP) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***ANSWER to Amended Complaint re: #1 Notice of Removal filed in State Court on 3/26/2020 but docketed in U.S. District Court on 4/3/2020 for case management purposes (GMP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
