Smail v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Deborah Jean Smail |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
2:2020cv00675 |
April 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Deborah Jean Smail: Notice of Service re: Summons upon William Barr, US Attorney General (04/27/20); Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (04/23/20); Michael Bailey, US Attorney for the District of Arizona (04/23/20) on 04/27/20; 04/23/20; 04/23/20. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Domestic return receipts and certified mail receipts)(Caldwell, Mark) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Daniel Talbert appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Talbert, Daniel) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BAS) |
Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. See attached Order. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/10/2020. (JAMA) |
Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying the Application (Doc. #2 ). Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $400.00 within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order or this action will be terminated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to terminate this action without further notice or Order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to pay the Court's filing fee within the time stated above. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/10/2020. (JAMA) |
Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on July 7, 2020. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/10/2020. (JAMA) |
Civil Case Opening Fee Received: $ 400.00 receipt number 0970-18166365. (Caldwell, Mark) |
Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-675-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Deborah Jean Smail. (Caldwell, Mark) (MYE) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Deborah Jean Smail. (Caldwell, Mark) (MYE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Deborah Jean Smail. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smail v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Daniel P Talbert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deborah Jean Smail | |
Represented By: | Mark Ross Caldwell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.