Lupe v. Corizon Healthcare LLC et al
Paul Harlan Lupe |
Kelly McElroy, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Rodney Stewart, Unknown Parties, Corizon Healthcare LLC, Chad Hartley and Kimberly Branum |
2:2020cv00708 |
April 9, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Eileen S Willett (PS) |
G Murray Snow |
Eileen S Willett |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Kimberly Branum, Corizon Healthcare LLC.(Metcalf, Lori) |
Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Corizon Healthcare LLC identifying Corporate Parent Valitas Health Services, Inc., Corporate Parent Corizon, LLC for Corizon Healthcare LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement 2nd Copy by rule)(Metcalf, Lori) |
![]() |
Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Paul Harlan Lupe: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on May 14, 2020 to Rodney Stewart MD . (Hallinan, Joane) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by Centurion of Arizona LLC, Rodney Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barnes, Sarah) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Lynn Barnes on behalf of Centurion of Arizona LLC, Rodney Stewart. (Barnes, Sarah) |
![]() |
Filing 9 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Kimberly Branum, Corizon Healthcare LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Metcalf, Lori) |
Filing 8 Defendant Kelly McElroy FNP's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Kelly McElroy.(Schade, Sarah) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Kimberly Branum, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Corizon Healthcare LLC, Chad Hartley, Kelly McElroy, Rodney Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (WLP) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (WLP) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Paul Harlan Lupe. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type, not all caps. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (WLP) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Paul Harlan Lupe. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (Hallinan, Joane) (WLP) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18163181 filed by Paul Harlan Lupe. (Hallinan, Joane) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(WLP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.