Thompson v. Gallego
| Richard Wayne Thompson |
| Ruben Gallego |
| 2:2020cv00769 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Richard Wayne Thompson. Reason for return: Attempted - Not Known. Document number #6 and #7 . (SJF) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed May 12, 2020, judgment of dismissal is entered for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed. (DXD) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is not required to pay the fees for this action. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and finds Plaintiff may appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/11/20. (DXD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DXD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served.(DXD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Wayne Thompson. (DXD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Wayne Thompson.(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thompson v. Gallego | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Wayne Thompson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ruben Gallego | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
