Jensen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Betty Lou Jensen
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2020cv00861
Filed: May 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michael T Liburdi
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 terminating #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. ***Pro hac vice incorrectly filed into civil case, attorney notified to refile in pro hac master case and pay $100 pro hac vice fee.*** Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
May 11, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Ashish A. Agrawal by Betty Lou Jensen. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Agrawal, Ashish)
May 11, 2020 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Ashish A Agrawal on behalf of Plaintiff Betty Lou Jensen. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
May 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY: Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. See document for further details. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 5/04/2020. (REK)
May 4, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
May 3, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18242094. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00861-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA)
May 3, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Betty Lou Jensen. (Agrawal, Ashish) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA)
May 3, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18242094 filed by Betty Lou Jensen. (Agrawal, Ashish) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jensen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Lou Jensen
Represented By: Ashish A Agrawal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?