Broussard v. Arizona, State of
Petitioner: Tyrone T Broussard
Respondent: Arizona, State of, Unknown Coday and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2020cv00868
Filed: May 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles (PS)
Referring Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and denying #6 Motion to Request Permission to File Untimely Petition... to the extent that it seeks any relief. Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #4 ) is dismissed without prejudice, with 30 days leave to amend. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Petitioner fails to comply. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/4/20. (DXD)
June 1, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Permission to File Untimely Petition for Notice of Post-Conviction Relief by Tyrone T Broussard. (6 pages) (WLP)
June 1, 2020 Filing 5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Tyrone T Broussard (2 pages). (DXD)
June 1, 2020 Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Tyrone T Broussard (11 pages).(DXD)
May 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ), which the Court construes as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Petitioner does not comply. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/7/20. (DXD)
May 1, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD)
May 1, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Tyrone T Broussard (4 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (DXD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Broussard v. Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown Coday
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tyrone T Broussard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?