Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Darryl Lawrence Allen |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2020cv00880 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. See document for further details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/19/2020. (REK)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER/NOTICE directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on August 4, 2020. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/19/2020. (REK)
|
| Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number PHX219229. (CLB) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Darryl Lawrence Allen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (15 pages)(CLB) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying the Motion #2 without prejudice and directing Plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee of $400.00 on or before May 22, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not file a completed application or pays the $400.00 filing fee, this matter may be dismissed without prejudice and without further Order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate this action, without further leave of the Court, should Plaintiff fail to comply with the Court's Order. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/07/2020. (REK)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REK) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G. Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00880-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Darryl Lawrence Allen. (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Darryl Lawrence Allen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darryl Lawrence Allen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
