Riley v. Shinn et al
Kristie C Riley |
Rachelle Moore, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Unknown Parties, Miles W Howard, Richard Pratt, Steve Ibrahim and David Shinn |
2:2020cv00932 |
May 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John Z Boyle (PS) |
John Z Boyle |
G Murray Snow |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Defendants Shinn and Pratt's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Richard Pratt, David Shinn.(Lombino, Michelle) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Centurion of Arizona LLC. (Barnes, Sarah) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Centurion of Arizona LLC.(Barnes, Sarah) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Lynn Barnes on behalf of Centurion of Arizona LLC, Steve Ibrahim, Rachelle Moore. (Barnes, Sarah) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Centurion of Arizona LLC, Miles W Howard, Steve Ibrahim, Rachelle Moore, Richard Pratt, David Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #2 Summons Submitted, #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kristie C Riley. (Attachments: #1 Summons Howard, #2 Summons Centurion)(Miller, Audrey) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Count Four is dismissed in part with respect to Plaintiff's claim that Defendant Centurion is vicariously liable for its employees' violations of Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment rights. Defendants John and Jane Does 1-10 and Organizations A-F are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If properly completed, the Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses filed at Doc. 2. This matter is assigned to the standard track and referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). See document for further details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 6/9/20. (GMP) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #4 Affidavit filed by Kristie C Riley. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 5.5(g) - Documents signed by an attorney shall be filed using that attorney's ECF log-in and password and shall not be filed using a log-in and password belonging to another attorney. Document(s) signed by attorney Kirstin Eidenbach but submitted using the log-in and password belonging to attorney Audrey Miller. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (GMP) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Kirstin Eidenbach re: #1 Complaint Certification of Medical Expert Necessity by Plaintiff Kristie C Riley. (Miller, Audrey) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Kristie C Riley. (submitted by Audrey Miller) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (REK) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18276649 filed by Kristie C Riley. (submitted by Audrey Miller) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.