Stoffle v. Cintas Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Richard Stoffle
Defendant: Unknown Parties and Cintas Corporation
Case Number: 2:2020cv01022
Filed: May 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle
Referring Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 AMENDED ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (Doc. #9 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is stayed and ordered to binding arbitration in conformity with this stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a joint status report six months from the date of this Order, and every six months thereafter, summarizing the status of the arbitration. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all hearing dates currently on calendar are vacated. This Court shall maintain jurisdiction pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 9 to enforce any award resulting from the binding arbitration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to stay (Doc. #4 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/7/20. (MAW)
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 *AMENDED by Doc. #11 * ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (Doc. #4 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is stayed and ordered to binding arbitration in conformity with this stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a joint status report six months from the date of this Order, and every six months thereafter, summarizing the status of the arbitration. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all hearing dates currently on calendar are vacated. This Court shall maintain jurisdiction pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 9 to enforce any award resulting from the binding arbitration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to stay (Doc. #4 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/7/20. (MAW) Modified on 7/7/2020 (MAW).
July 6, 2020 Filing 9 STIPULATION to Stay Proceedings Pending the Outcome of Arbitration by Richard Stoffle. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Stay)(Fugate, Joel)
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PRELIMINARY ORDER [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/8/20. (MAW)
June 5, 2020 Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Dominic W Lanza. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-20-1022-PHX-DWL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
June 4, 2020 Filing 6 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
June 1, 2020 Filing 4 * MOTION to Stay or, Alternatively, Dismiss This Case Pending Arbitration by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hover, Charles). *Added MOTION to Dismiss Case on 6/2/2020 (GMP).
May 26, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18314995. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John Z Boyle. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-1022-PHX-JZB. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (DLC)
May 26, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cintas Corporation. (Hover, Charles) (DLC)
May 26, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2020-001082. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18314995 filed by Cintas Corporation. (Hover, Charles) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)(DLC)
May 26, 2020 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Certified Mail Receipt re: Amended Civil Summons, First Amended Complaint, Amended Certificate Regarding Compulsory Arbitration and Plaintiff's Amended Demand for Jury Trial upon Cintas Corporation on 4/23/2020. (Original filed in Maricopa Superior Court on 5/19/2020). (DLC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stoffle v. Cintas Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cintas Corporation
Represented By: Charles Stedman Hover, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Stoffle
Represented By: Erin A Hertzog
Represented By: Joel Taylor Fugate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?