Collada v. Barr et al
| Jose Rafael Ramirez Collada |
| Kenneth Cuccinelli, Albert Carter, Chad Wolfe, William Barr and Chad Wolf |
| 2:2020cv01058 |
| May 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John Z Boyle |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Alien Detainee - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER withdrawing the reference to the Magistrate Judge. FURTHER ORDERED granting the Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. #12 ) and dismissing this action in its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 6/30/2020. (RMW)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal by William Barr, Albert Carter, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Chad Wolf. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Piensook, Kwan) |
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: petition, order upon William Barr on 6/8/20. (SLQ) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Petition/ Order upon US Attorney on 6/5/20. (DXD) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Petition/ Order upon Albert Carter on 6/4/20. (DXD) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Assistant U.S. Attorney Kwan Piensook appearing for William Barr, Albert Carter, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Chad Wolf. *SPECIAL APPEARANCE ONLY*. (Piensook, Kwan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to US Attorney for the District of Arizona, William Barr, Albert Carter, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Chad Wolfe. (GMP) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #2 Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction. The motion is denied in part as to Petitioner's request for a stay of removal and granted in part as to Petitioner's request for prior notice. The Clerk of Court must send a copy of this order by separate email to the Immigration TRO Group. The Clerk shall serve: a copy of the Summons, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ), and this Order upon the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, the United States Attorney General and Respondents by certified mail. Respondents shall have 30 days from the date of service to answer the Petition. Petitioner shall have 15 days from the filing of Respondents' Answer to the Petition to file a Reply. Petitioner must file a "Notice of Change in Status" with the Clerk of Court within 5 days of any material change in Petitioner's immigration or custody status. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/1/20. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Jose Rafael Ramirez Collada. (Ayala, Siovhan) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(BAC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Jose Rafael Ramirez Collada. (Ayala, Siovhan) (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(BAC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241). Filing fee received: $5.00, receipt number 0970-18331392 filed by Jose Rafael Ramirez Collada. (Ayala, Siovhan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Affidavit Certificate of Service)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
