Grimes v. Penzone
| Charles T Grimes |
| Paul Penzone, David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2020cv01098 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John Z Boyle |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PARTY'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Charles T Grimes: #236814, ASPC Winslow - Kaibab Unit, 2100 S Highway 87, Winslow, AZ 86047. (SLQ) (1 page. Address in ECF did not require updating). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Joshua C. Smith appearing for Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mark Brnovich, Paul Penzone, David Shinn. . (Smith, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 07/02/20. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim) |
Filing 7
Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254) - The Clerk shall serve a copy of the Amended Petition (Doc. #6 ) and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail. Within 2 business days, the Attorney General's Office will acknowledge receipt of the Amended Petition and the Court's Order and within 5 business days will file a notice of appearance. Respondents must answer the Amended Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/2/20. (Attachments: #1 Amended Petition) (DXD)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Charles T Grimes (209 pages). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Exhibit E-F, #3 Exhibit G-I) (DXD) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PARTY'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Charles T Grimes: #236814, Kaibab Unit, Winslow-ASPC-Kaibab, 2100 S. Hwy. 87, Winslow, AZ 86047. (same as current address, 1 page) (KFZ) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number PHX220163. (DXD) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Petitioner's 2254 Petition (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2254 petition. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Petitioner fails to comply. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 6/9/20. (DXD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Charles T Grimes (88 pages). (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Facts Part 1, #2 Affidavit of Facts Part 2, #3 Envelope) (DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
