Viola v. Shinn et al
| Giuseppe Viola |
| David Shinn and Edwin Jensen |
| 2:2020cv01107 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Filing re: #16 Notice, #17 Additional Attachment by Giuseppe Viola (1 page). (DXD) |
| Filing 17 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #16 Notice re: Consideration of Motion by Judge Snow by Petitioner Giuseppe Viola (2 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE re: Consideration of Motion by Judge Snow re: #15 MOTION for Administrative Review by Giuseppe Viola (1 page). (DXD) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Administrative Review by Giuseppe Viola. (2 pages) (REK) |
Filing 14
ORDER that Petitioner's #7 "Motion for Abatement Ab Initio" and #8 "Motion for Expansion of Record" are denied. This case must remain closed. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 6/22/2020. (LFIG)
|
| Filing 13 Letter by Giuseppe Viola re: #11 Affidavit, #12 MOTION for Joinder, #10 MOTION for Relief from Judgment Under FRCP 60(b) as Void Due to Mistake. (SLQ) (1 page). |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Joinder by Giuseppe Viola. (SLQ) (1 page). |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Giuseppe Viola re: #10 MOTION for Relief from Judgment Under FRCP 60(b) as Void Due to Mistake by Petitioner Giuseppe Viola. (SLQ) (2 pages). |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Relief from Judgment Under FRCP 60(b) as Void Due to Mistake by Giuseppe Viola. (SLQ) (2 pages). |
| Filing 9 Letter by Giuseppe Viola re: #8 MOTION for Expansion of Record Pursuant to 2254 R. 1(b) and 7(b), #7 MOTION for Abatement Abinitio. (SLQ) (9 pages). |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Expansion of Record Pursuant to 2254 R. 1(b) and 7(b) by Giuseppe Viola. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5)(SLQ) (130 pages). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Abatement Abinitio by Giuseppe Viola. (SLQ) (1 page). |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court's Order filed June 10, 2020, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2241 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (SLQ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. (2) Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. (3) Petitioner's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. #3 ) is denied as moot. (4) Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 6/10/20. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SLQ) |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Giuseppe Viola. (SLQ) (1 page). |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Giuseppe Viola. (SLQ) (2 pages). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Giuseppe Viola. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SLQ) (48 pages, plus envelope). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
