Bazan v. Hammerman & Hultgren PC
Plaintiff: Jeanette Bazan
Defendant: Hammerman & Hultgren PC
Case Number: 2:2020cv01138
Filed: June 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Jeanette Bazan. (Thompson, Russell)
July 20, 2020 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hammerman & Hultgren PC. (Wilson, Donald)
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 10/29/2020 at 04:30 PM before Judge Douglas L Rayes. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least 14 calendar days before the Scheduling Conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/16/2020. (MMO)
July 16, 2020 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Hammerman & Hultgren PC.(Wilson, Donald)
July 6, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE re: Service by Jeanette Bazan re: #5 Order re Rule 12(b) Motions . (Thompson, Russell)
July 6, 2020 Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Jeanette Bazan: Proof of Service re: Complaint upon Hammerman & Hultgren, PC on June 26, 2020. (Thompson, Russell)
June 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/11/2020. (MMO)
June 9, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hammerman & Hultgren PC. (MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
June 9, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18363595. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-1138-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE)
June 9, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Jeanette Bazan. (Thompson, Russell) (MYE)
June 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18363595 filed by Jeanette Bazan. (Thompson, Russell) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bazan v. Hammerman & Hultgren PC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hammerman & Hultgren PC
Represented By: Donald Wilson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeanette Bazan
Represented By: Russell Snow Thompson, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?