James v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Sally Ann James |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
2:2020cv01183 |
June 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
James A Teilborg |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Sally Ann James: Notice of Service re: Summons upon William Barr, US Attorney General (July 2, 2020); Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (July 23, 2020); Michael Bailey, US Attorney for the District of Arizona (June 29, 2020) on July 2, 2020; July 23, 2020; June 29, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Domestic return receipts and certified mail receipts)(Caldwell, Mark) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Wyeth McAdam appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (McAdam, S) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefor. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service of the summons and complaint. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 6/18/2020. (RMW) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY - Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendant's answering brief. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/17/2020. (LAD) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, US Attorney General, and US Attorney. (MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-1183-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Sally Ann James. (Caldwell, Mark) (MYE) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Sally Ann James. (Caldwell, Mark) (MYE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Sally Ann James. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: James v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sally Ann James | |
Represented By: | Mark Ross Caldwell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | S Wyeth McAdam |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.